I can't say I relate to him that much, other than being lonely and an only child, but that didn't stop me from seeing how he was as a human being. I learned a lot about Dahmer that I never knew previously. There's no use showing us what we already know.
How true is dahmer 2002 movie#
And the movie doesn't try to shock us with gory details of these grisly occurrences, because that's not its intention. We don't what drove Dahmer to madness, and what led up to the subsequent rapes, murders and eventual cannibalism. We all know about the crimes that Dahmer committed. But this movie was not made to portray him as a hero, nor a villain. Like everybody, I believe that what Jeffrey Dahmer did was wrong, and I feel sorry for all the families who lost sons and other relatives due to him. Ripley" (a great film) focusing on a psychopath, but that's because Tom Ripley is a fictional character.
There weren't too many complaints about "The Talented Mr. Films like this always have the immediate handicap of focusing not only on an evil, psychotic main character, but focusing on an evil, psychotic main character who we all know. This is a very well-made film that was put together on a very low budget.
People seem really disgusted by the film, but the only thing that disgusts me are the negative reviews. Let's just hope that we can get someone as gifted in the role as Renner to be in that film. The bottom line is that while this film is more than worthwhile as a kind of extended footnote, a much better film about Dahmer needs to be made. And for someone unfamiliar with Dahmer, they probably would spend a lot of time trying to figure out why the film keeps jumping from one event to another, frequently going back and forth with the same events. I found myself regularly checking the running time, wondering how and when Jacobson was going to get to this other material before the film had to end. To make a film about Dahmer where these things are not explored not only downplays the severity of his crimes, but it also leaves out fairly essential aspects of Dahmer's character, if this is to be a character study. He cannibalized victims and engaged in necrophilia. He had a severed head in his refrigerator. He kept vats of acid in his apartment to dispose of body parts. Dahmer was a man who conducted experiments on his victims, trying to turn some of them into lobotomized, robot-like companions. All of this was intriguing to me, but I wanted the lurid details to be explored more. In fact, we only see Dahmer kill two humans during the course of the film, and both are relatively not graphic, and relatively quick events. We see him constantly drinking alcohol through most of these events. We see actions taken by the police that would be unbelievable if we didn't know that they actually happened that way, more or less. We see him discovering and trying to come to terms with his homosexuality in a twisted way. We see Dahmer interacting with his family (primarily his grandmother and father) in a peculiar, distanced way. After the first 20 minutes or so, the film becomes non-sequential, and links together a number of events that provide clues (as much of a clue as we can have, at least) into Dahmer's behavior. Writer/director David Jacobson chose to make the film a psychological portrait, rather than a chronological retelling of Dahmer's misdeeds, and rather than focusing on the lurid details of the crimes. Bruce Davison, as Dahmer's father, and Artel Kayaru, as Rodney, also turn in great performances. Jeremy Renner, who plays Dahmer, is fantastic. That's not to say that the film is a complete failure. You need a familiarity with Dahmer's life to piece the film together as you watch it. It might work better if you're unfamiliar with the background material, but on the other hand, it might be too disjointed to work in that case. The problem is that under those expectations, Dahmer isn't likely to be the film you want it to be. If you're at all familiar with the facts about Jeffrey Dahmer-and probably a hefty percentage of people interested in the film are familiar with Dahmer to some extent-it's difficult to watch this film without strong expectations.
How true is dahmer 2002 serial#
Based on real-life serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who was active primarily in Wisconsin in the 1980s, this film focuses on a few key episodes in Dahmer's life.
0 kommentar(er)
